Haworth & Lexon was given a high praise
by "Law Firms In Greater China"(2003 edition) of Asia
Law & Practice.
Recently, "Law Firms In Greater China"(2003 edition)
edited by Asia Law & Practice, one of the most famous law
publication companie in Hong Kong, has given some high praises
to Haworth & Lexon law office. In those praises, it points
out that Haworth & Lexon is "strong in corporate and
commercial practice, dispute resolution, and intellectual property."
To demonstrate the special advantage of Haworth & Lexon in
IP practice, it briefly shows a trademark infringement case in
which we represented NIPPON trademark right holder. Because of
the high importance of the judgment to judicial authorities around
China, it especially points out that, our attorneys have successfully
persuaded the concerning courts to confirm that NIPPON trademark
is well-known trademark. If you wish to obtain much more information
about the NIPPON case, please read other relevant in depth contents
under title "What's New" on the website of Haworth &
Lexon.
Asia Law & Practice is the specialist Asian-based division
of Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC, one of the world's largest
business publishers. Asia Law & Practice is considered to
be the region's premier publisher of legal, financial, tax and
human resources titles and has acquired a strong reputation for
excellence, accuracy, objectivity and innovation.
The following is the original text relating to our firm in the
book "Law Firms In Greater China"(2003 edition) of Asia
Law & Practice:
Shanghai firm Haworth & Lexon, one of the China's numerous
local law firms with anglicized names, is strong in corporate
and commercial practice, dispute resolution and intellectual property.
Partner Bailey Xu echoes similar opinions to those of Kangxin's
Samson Yu, stating that economic growth and high levels of foreign
investment have created a heightened demand for IP protection
from both foreign investors and domestic parties that are seeking
to protect their brands.
Haworth & Lexon in January won a trademark infringement case
for its client Nippon Paint Co. The Higher People's Court in Hubei
province ruled in favour of Nippon, confirming that the defendant
had illegally used Nippon's trademark, which the court additionally
recognized as a "well-known" trademark. Although China
enacted legislation that does recognize well-known status for
trademarks, it has been rare that a court has actually ruled in
favour of a plaintiff's claim that its trademark is well known.
Nippon launched cases in several cities around China in August
2002, and the Hubei ruling was the first final judgment that has
been delivered.